F2 female behavior score

This is the dataset to evaluate time in association, male courting effort on female mate choic

Data for color pattern factor analysis

This is the dataset to calculate number of genetic factors for male color patter

Mean (x axis) and variance (y axis) of the female mate choice index in the parentals, and F₁ and F₂ hybrids.

<p>Mean (x axis) and variance (y axis) of the female mate choice index in the parentals, and F₁ and F₂ hybrids.</p

Comparisons of the residuals derived from the regression of male lateral displays (a), quivers (b), and circles (c) against the amount of time that female stayed in each side of the tank between the successfully mated males and rejected males; further comparison of the time in association (d) that female spent with the successful mated males and rejected males is shown.

<p>Comparisons of the residuals derived from the regression of male lateral displays (a), quivers (b), and circles (c) against the amount of time that female stayed in each side of the tank between the successfully mated males and rejected males; further comparison of the time in association (d) that female spent with the successful mated males and rejected males is shown.</p

The estimated effective number of factors influencing cichlid female mate choice for a range of allelic effects (C_a = 0 assumes the equivalence of allelic effects; C_a = 0.25 assumes a normal distribution of allelic effects; C_a = 1 assumes the allelic effects have a negative exponential distribution; C_a = 4 assumes that allelic effects have a leptokurtic distribution).

<p>The estimated effective number of factors influencing cichlid female mate choice for a range of allelic effects (C_a = 0 assumes the equivalence of allelic effects; C_a = 0.25 assumes a normal distribution of allelic effects; C_a = 1 assumes the allelic effects have a negative exponential distribution; C_a = 4 assumes that allelic effects have a leptokurtic distribution).</p

The square root transformed means (standard errors) of melanophore counts (within a 0.25 mm² area for pelvic fins (Fig. 1).

<p>The square root transformed means (standard errors) of melanophore counts (within a 0.25 mm² area for pelvic fins (<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0114798#pone-0114798-g001" target="_blank">Fig. 1</a>).</p

The estimated effective number of factors (standard deviation) influencing scale and fin melanophore counts for a range of allelic effects (C_a = 0 assumes the equivalence of allelic effects; C_a = assumes a normal distribution of allelic effects; C_a = 1 assumes the allelic effects have a negative exponential distribution; C_a = 4 assumes that allelic effects have a leptokurtic distribution).

<p>The estimated effective number of factors (standard deviation) influencing scale and fin melanophore counts for a range of allelic effects (C_a = 0 assumes the equivalence of allelic effects; C_a =  assumes a normal distribution of allelic effects; C_a = 1 assumes the allelic effects have a negative exponential distribution; C_a = 4 assumes that allelic effects have a leptokurtic distribution).</p

The boxplot of melanophore count in fin of the parentals, and F₁, F₂ hybrids and backcrosses.

<p>BZ represents backcross with <i>M. zebra</i>, while BB represents backcross with <i>M. benetos</i>.</p

The boxplot of melanophore counts in scale of the parentals, and F₁, F₂ hybrids and backcrosses.

<p>BZ represents backcross with <i>M. zebra</i>, while BB represents backcross with <i>M. benetos</i>.</p

Comparison of F₂ scale (a) and fin (b) phenotypes between individuals that exclusively mated with <i>M. zebra</i> or <i>M. benetos</i>.

<p>Comparison of F₂ scale (a) and fin (b) phenotypes between individuals that exclusively mated with <i>M. zebra</i> or <i>M. benetos</i>.</p